Why collecting Long Term Ecological Data is not cool enough for funding agencies?

Most of my papers include in one way or another a sentence apologising for not having long term data, and excusing myself for using either a snapshot of whatever happens in a given year, or using long term data that is limited in regards of its completeness or has sampling limitations. This is because most pressing questions in ecology require to consider time to fully understand how things work, but temporally replicated data is rare.

The solution? Let’s collect the appropriate data, then! Not that simple. Funding for long term ecological data is almost non existing in EU*. I guess they take too much time to build up, and do not produce high impact factor papers in the first year. However, most long term research is not expensive, and can be maintained with a small budget, but surprisingly nobody wants to fund it. And yes, I tried, and I got comments like “not novel enough”.

Why I am writing this now? The Doñana Biological Station has been doing some monitoring programs for the last ~10 years. I am not going to explain the details, because I’ll probably do it wrong, but the fact is that the long term monitoring funds externally granted for 2014 didn’t arrived and the monitoring of e.g. butterflies in the park where about to be suspended in 2015. It was only thanks to the direction of EBD, and individual researchers that we can finally maintain this going, and avoid losing the temporal series, at least,  in 2015. For example, the cost of maintaining the butterfly monitoring is under 1000 EUR, which I will cover this year from my personal grants**. I am not using this data right now and the data is publicly released, but I see the value of having it. With the several threats the park has right now, including climate and land use change, having a baseline data on how communities fluctuate is critical to understand how the ecosystem will respond.

I would like to do more long term ecological research in my lab. I calculated this research will cost less than ~4 000 EUR/year. Why the Spanish ministry is willing to give me a ~50 000 budget for a 3 years project, but not a 12 year project with the same budget? I know it’s a political constrain, but Science should be beyond politics.

*LTER sites in the US is not optimal, but works better than here.

** And I know other researchers are assuming costs of monitoring other organisms.

Advertisements

Postdoc position available with me in plant-pollintor networks

PDF version here.

We are currently seeking applicants for a 18 month Postdoc position at Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC) in Sevilla to conduct synthesis work on the effect of landscape structure and mass-flowering crops on pollinator function to native plants, and plant-pollinator networks across Europe.

The postdoc will contribute to the funded BIODIVERSA project (Enhancing biodiversity-based ecosystem services to crops through optimized densities of green infrastructure in agricultural landscapes (ECODEAL, http://www.cec.lu.se/research/ecodeal). 

Candidates should have an interest in pollination ecology, know how to handle large complex databases, and have strong writing and statistical skills (preferably in R).

If you are interested in this position, please, send your CV with a complete list of your publications and the contact details of two reference persons to nacho.bartomeus@gmail.com. Please, merge all documents into a single PDF file and include your name in the file name.

Salary: 35.040 € per yr. before taxes

Deadline for interested applicants: March 30th, 2015

Montserrat VilàNacho Bartomeus